This is an application for extension of time to file another
application for review of the decision of this Court, which had set aside the
sale of a disputed house, the property of the Respondents. Before arguing the
merits of the case the learned Counsel for both parties were required to
address the Court on the propriety of the application in terms of rule 66(7) of
the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. On the part of the Respondents, they
categorically stated that the spirit of rule 66(7) of the Rules is to bar any
application for review after the first review is made and finally determined.
The main issue before the Court was whether or not the present application is
proper in the light of rule 66(7) of the Rules.