The Respondent offered to employ the applicant on six
months’ probation period. After expiry of the probation period, the applicant’s
appointment was not confirmed and nothing was communicated to him though he
remained in employment. Later on, the Respondent terminated the applicant’s
employment. Following termination of employment, the applicant instituted a
suit in the District Court against the Respondent. The Court decided in favour
of the applicant as the Respondent did not enter appearance. More than four
years later, the applicant lodged another suit in the High Court against the
Respondent. The suit was dismissed with costs by the Court on a preliminary
objection. Aggrieved, the applicant unsuccessfully appealed to this Court. The
Court held that the suit the applicant lodged in the High Court was bad in law
for failure to comply with the law. Dissatisfied, the applicant lodged the
present application for review urging the Court to review its judgment on the
ground that, there is a manifest error on the face of the record resulting in
the miscarriage of justice. The issue before the Court is whether or not the
applicant has advanced enough grounds to warrant a review.